| Global Financial
Crisis, Social Democracy and Nepal's Choice
Dev Raj Dahal, Head, FES Nepal Office
Introduction
The current global financial crisis marks
the end of one epoch to begin the next. The triumph of neo-liberalism
- defined by the Washington Consensus- caused the regulatory
failure of state and has become one of the greatest threats
to global economic stability. It had reduced politics and government
to the elite control akin to pre-democratic era. Obviously,
as economy was disembodied from society the crisis spilled over
the credit regime and has produced negative ecological, social
and political consequences. George Soros has rightly said, "The
crisis was generated by the system itself." In the G-20
meet of April 2, 2009 in London British Prime Minister Gordon
Brown rightly proclaimed the farewell to Washington Consensus.
The meet made essential strides in battling current crisis through
fiscal stimulus, limits on borrowing and spending, healthy banking,
reducing trade imbalances, fighting trade barriers, providing
support to developing countries to mitigate the effects of crisis,
cutting tax heavens for investors. The crisis provided an opportunity
to reshape new global order. To put in simple words: create
a stakeholder's economy embedded in society and careful of nature.
Still, many challenges remain.
Key Challenges
" The first challenge for social democrats
is to create a stable global financial system that properly
balances private incentive with public responsibility and maintains
a balance between market and the state. Neo-liberalism's interest
in tax holidays and refusal to acknowledge the long-term economic
cost of privatization of health, education, skills and training
undermined long-term economic growth and transformed citizens
into mere consumers. The key task now is to transform consumers
into citizens. This is possible only when elected representatives
shape economic policies according to the needs and priority
of citizens and engage them in the polity.
" The second challenge is to minimize
the impact of crisis on massive job layoffs. The ILO estimates
that about 1 billion workers will lose their jobs. Social democracy's
historical promises to balance the private and the public, profit
and wages and the market and the state offers the best guarantee
of promoting economic growth through market mechanism and distribution
of public goods through the state, civil society and community
organizations. A new social contract is, therefore, essential
at the global level for the creation of a just international
order.
" The third challenge is to minimize
the impact of the crisis on poverty, inequality, declining labor
standards and political stability in the developing world. New
movements and identities are formed in opposition to certain
groups. It is fragmenting political spheres, vitiating state-society
harmony and generating structural rifts and conflicts. Proper
implementation of World Bank's poverty reduction strategy paper,
judicious use of bilateral official development assistance and
the national capacity building for the implementation of the
Millennium Development Goals have become essential to reduce
conflict producing causes--poverty, unemployment and social
and political discontents.
" The fourth challenge is to manage climate change and
find alternative mechanism of energy that is less polluting
to environment. Reckless exploitation of nature and total deregulation
of the labor market have created a divide in society. This divide
has been institutionalized by the commercialization of media,
education, health and economy thus creating more losers than
winners. If profits are privatized and losses socialized, the
social system cannot become cohesive and stable. Without proper
role of the state in the redistribution of benefits and vibrant
civil society groups to care for the voiceless, the markets
cannot become self-correcting. The lifeblood of politics, the
link of political classes and their parties to the people, needs
strengthening to attach the electorates to public life. The
declining capacity of leadership now to solve the problems of
society marks doubt on their legitimacy and mirrors the deficit
of trust. Only the compatibility of the ends of means of politics
can rejuvenate it.
Renewal of Middle
The message of London Summit is clear: judicious
role of state in social, economic and ecological justice. Accordingly,
it laid the urgency of rescuing the financial system from collapse,
provided stimulus to the real economy and underlined the necessity
of a national and global regulatory regime in which the state
has the duty to determine and enforce the rules of the system.
In this context, social democratic response mirrors the middle
way: support for the market economy rather than market society
and strong role for the state as regulator, funder and provider
of public goods and services. It accepts the power of market
to increase innovation, efficiency, competition, investment
and productivity growth in a framework of social justice. For
social democrats, stability of democratic polity represents
public goods and public goods always take precedence over individual
pursuit for profit maximization. Justice at the social, ecological
and inter-generational level is an essential component of social
democracy world wide. It is beefed by the ideals of freedom,
solidarity and peace. It is rooted in the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, humanitarian laws and constitutional principles.
The pursuit of social justice is founded on the belief that
all human beings have an intrinsic right to human dignity, equality
of opportunity and the ability to lead a self-fulfilling life.
Nepal's Choice
The ideals of social democracy cannot be achieved
for all citizens under the conditions of social and economic
inequality and poverty. It, therefore, stresses that the state
has to fulfill not only civil and political rights but also
social, economic and cultural rights. In order to enable democratic
conditions for "positive citizenship," the Nepalese
people of various positions require different policies for equitable
and just distribution of resources through a thriving public
sector, gainful employment and a support to the welfare state.
In this context, the poor and dispossessed Nepalese requires
not only protection but also additional opportunities so that
democracy creates level playing field for all for life chances
and equal participation in public life rather than creating
winners and losers. It views that if losers do not have any
stake in the political system, democracy becomes a game of power-specializing
elite and electoral politics cannot generate political and constitutional
stability.
Realization of social justice requires substantial
democratization of power, investment in job-creation, health,
education, disabilities, critical development infrastructures
and fulfillment of basic livelihoods. Some interests are non-negotiable
such as basic needs while others rest on matters of individual
choice-like professional job preference. The structural condition
of Nepalese society, the nation's constitutional commitment
to the enlargement of social rights, endorsement to the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights and ILO Core Labor Standards are
orienting Nepal's constitution making process towards a social
state. The World Summit for Social Development of 1995 found
a convergence of liberal and social democracy on poverty alleviation,
productive employment, social protection, social dialogue and
right to work as mutually supporting strategies for democracy
and civilized life.
Conclusion
An economy cannot grow without social support
and ecological sustainability. Coping with structural change
requires support for the lifelong learning including the learning
of public policy by citizens and their positive and negative
citizenship rights. The crisis of global proportion in food,
energy, finance and ecology requires global democratic accountability
for its resolution and a sound partnership of the states, markets,
civil society groups and international regimes as well as enhanced
rules and institutions for democracy rooted into the basic values
of freedom, social justice, solidarity and peace.
|