|
Report on Media as a Medium of Peace
Organised by Press Chautari Nepal (PCN)
20 May 2010
On May 20, 2010 Press Chautari Nepal (PCN)
organized a one-day national seminar in Kathmandu on "Media
as a Medium of Peace." Altogether 150 media persons including
30 women, media houses and politicians were gathered to discuss.
Prime Minister Nepal inaugurated the meeting while General-Secretary
of NC, Minister for Communication and Information shared their
ideas. Six commentators from various media federations presented
their comments on the paper presented. The discussion informed
the politicians that they should look peace beyond party interest,
maintain human rights condition, agenda setting and lobbying,
media diversity, act as connectors of society, optimization of
actors interest by finding middle ground, media code against propaganda
and culture of peace. Nepal is in transition from conflict to
peace but there are numerous obstacles to implement the provisions
of peace accord. With a view to generate alternative ideas about
breaking the prolonged deadlock Press Chautari organized this
seminar in cooperation with Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES) Nepal
office. There were two papers.
Inaugural Function
Inaugurating the seminar Prime Minister Nepal
said that he was ready to step down if there was national consensus
to conclude the peace and statue writing processes. "The
government wants to solve the present deadlock on the basis
of consensus, cooperative action and unity among the parties."
PM Nepal said that until the Maoists turned into a civilian
party, gave up their strategy of capturing the state and vacated
the cantonments, national consensus was far from realization.
'To strike consensus, they should also use the language of consensus
and co-work," PM said in an apparent reference to the Maoists.
He said that the Maoists were circulating the rumors that the
government wanted to dissolve the Constituent Assembly (CA)
but now their claim had been debunked after the coalition registered
a Bill at the parliament to extend the CA tenure. "So,
I urge all not to be swayed by misleading propaganda spread
by the Maoists," he added. He said that it was not time
to engage in the blame game but to work for creating conducive
atmosphere to build confidence and consensus among the parties.
Stating that there could not be consensus to fulfill the ego
of particular leader, PM Nepal said that they could not move
ahead by undermining the democratic norms and rule of law that
they established through hard work and sacrifice. He said that
the role of the journalists had further increased in institutionalizing
democracy in the transition period. The media have been victim
of non-state actors, he said and added that the government was
committed to protecting professional rights and freedom of the
journalists.
Minister for Information and Communications
Shankar Pokharel said that some elements were trying to depict
a dreadful scenario after May 28. Minister Pokharel urged the
media to play a constructive role to reduce such fear. "The
state will not remain in void no matter how much crisis is there,"
Pokharel said. He said that the institutions of President, the
government and the parliament would continue to function even
after May 28, the deadline of the constitution writing. The
Nepalese political parties will finally find the way out of
crisis within the framework of interim constitution and democratic
values as happened in the past, he said. Nepali Congress spokesman
Arjun Narsingh KC asked journalists to impartially judge as
to who were responsible to stall the peace and constitution
writing process. KC accused the main opposition Maoists of not
implementing the past agreements signed between the seven-party
alliance and the Maoists. "It will be quite an injustice
to put all the parties in the same basket for the current deadlock,"
he said. CPN-UML publicity department head Pradeep Gyawali said
that the Maoists were trying to barter the chair of PM with
the extension of the CA. Gyawali said that the Maoist-led government
did nothing to conclude the peace process in line with the interim
constitution. "We are not ready to derail the peace process
to satisfy the ego of a leader," he said referring to the
Maoist demand of the formation of the government under their
leadership.If there is a guarantee to peace and statute writing,
PM Nepal will tender his resignation within minutes, he said.
Dev Raj Dahal, head of the German political foundation Friedrich
Ebert Stiftung, said democracy offered the media to mediate
contending perspectives through dialogue, non-violent communications
and collective action. He said that journalists needed to inform
the public for the democratization of the society so as to democratize
the politicians; to bring forth the diversity of the society
to bolster its legitimacy; bridge knowledge gap between those
who know more and those who know less; and spread civic education
for building the culture of peace. "Pro-active engagement
of Nepalese media has been useful to remove the irrationalities
of society and policy attention of stakeholders of society to
mitigate conflict-producing root and proxy causes and struggle
for peaceful and just future society," he added. Federation
of Nepalese Journalists Dharmendra Jha, PCN president Gagan
Bista, former FNJ president Binshnu Nisthuri and SAFMA Nepal
head Shiva Gaule also spoke at the function. Media workers highlighted
that the types of inputs media provide for the citizens and
the government are essential to resolve multi-layered conflict
in society.
Functions of Conflict-Sensitive Media
Media is one of the key elements of socialization
of citizens into a democratic political culture. As the culture
of civility grows political actors can easily agree over their
principles and settle differences by non-violent means. The
process of peace and conflict is often cyclical, not straight
and linear. Therefore, every problem formulated rationally is
capable of solution. Democracy offers the media to mediate contending
perspectives through dialogue, non-violent communication and
collective action. Any workable effort to peace process must
be owned by the Nepalese themselves. The contextual and emotional
intelligence to learning gives journalists a clue into human
approach to peace. The usefulness of learning lies in modifying
behavior, changing attitude and adopting peace-promoting goal.
This means social learning of conflict dynamics is necessary
to its resolution and strengthening the sites of rational and
spiritual foundation to ensure peaceful coexistence of Nepal's
multiple faiths.
Reporting is about bringing the truth of human
condition in public life and sensitize citizens and leaders
to address it. During pre-conflict phase, Nepalese journalists
had provided early warning of fault line conflict and invited
preemptive response from the concerned authorities. During the
phase of violent conflict, they had supplied information to
ramp up citizens' sensitivity about conflict, enabled them to
take part in the social, economic and political processes in
a meaningful way, countered propaganda, disinformation and defamation
and event provocation and combated racism and ethnic hatred.
They had played role in mobilizing popular pressure for democratization,
conflict de-escalation, ceasefire monitoring, observation of
peace talk and exerted pressure for early signing of CPA, Interim
Constitution, drafting of new constitution by Constituent Assembly,
durable peace and structural reforms.
Peace requires peace-oriented conceptual framework
of structures, rules and behavior. Rational communication is
important to respond to a desirable change and establish transitional
justice for the conflict victims through welfare measures, non-violent
communication, establishing citizens' right to know and breaking
a culture of silence through a culture of articulation and peace.
Pro-active engagement of Nepalese media has been useful to remove
the irrationalities of society and bring policy attention of
stakeholders of society to mitigate conflict-producing root
and proxy causes and struggle for peaceful and just future society.
Outcome
Post-war situation of Nepal required journalists
to increase costs for the spoilers of peace, connect the broken
relation of society and act as bridge maker. At the end of discussion
the journalists came with some important points: first, journalists
should engage in peace education rather than focusing only on
the differences and conflict among the key political actors;
second, they should lobby for the accountability of political
actors for the implementation of peace accord; third, journalists
should work to convince the political parties and the government
to move beyond partisan interest and work for conflict reducing
policies and programs; fourth, journalists should report in
a very conflict-sensitive manner and maintain the impartiality
of news and views; fifth, exert pressure on political parties
to shorten the transition period; and finally, develop a mechanism
for consensus-based politics so that politicians undertake their
responsibility to complete constitution-drafting in time and
create an environment conducive for creativity and freedom.
|