|
Building Solidarity
Network of Conflict Victim Journalists
SOS signal from
news-diggers (A support document
for oral keynote presentation by R. K. Regmee at the National
Workshop on Building Solidarity Network of Conflict Victim Journalists
organized by International Press Institute - Nepal National
Committee and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung on 13 May 2005)
By R.K.Regmee
Conflict - victim journalists are the people,
who are penalized for communicating messages from senders to receivers.
They are the ones, who are rendered disabled to pursue their profession
in their own familiar turf. Like travelers in desert storm the
one-time news seekers lose the sense of their direction and find
their own confidence shaken immediately after they are kicked
out. In a sense they are forced to send SOS call, a silent one
contrasting with the distress- blip of ill-fated aircrafts in
crash-site. There is no established procedure for responding to
it. But some one or some institution could accidentally care to
pick it up and respond to their voice.
The saga of Nepali journalists who have become
conflict victims over the past decade ( particularly after February
1996) does not differ at all from the above - mentioned scenario.
Some of the 26 victims who spoke last year in IPI-N programme
had indicated the same. All are suffering from the shock of
job-loss, dark future and helpless present. The areas they have
left do not have the desired flow of information. The International
Press Institute - Nepal National Committee has made conscious
effort to understand their SOS call and help accordingly. Today's
programme seeks to consolidate what was commenced in Lalitpur
on 27th April, 2004 when organizers had for the first time drawn
attention towards conflict affected journalists by doing something
tangible through pooling resources and expressing collective
will to help fellow professionals of media. The move could be
called historic and sincerely devoted to the cause of free press.
Some observers do not feel happy to see high
weightage given to the issue of victim journalists. They follow
Paul Collier, economist of Oxford University, and consider countries'
civil war loss of 2.2 % of GDP per year as highly serious. (This
might put Nepal's loss in 2003 as 66.2 billion rupees.) Viewed
against the huge disappointing back drop of the conflict - nearly
12,000 dead, hundreds injured, and thousands displaced, over
25 billion rupees (usually mentioned in public talks)
lost in destruction of physical infra structure and over 12
billion rupees (tourism speakers often use this figure)
reduced in tourism revenue, several types of economic setbacks
caused by series of closures, highway blockade, and unrest and
educational backwardness due to disturbance in school premises-
the issue might look comparatively somewhat lighter on surface.
But in reality the question of displaced journalists is as worrying
as the deterioration marking Nepali society these days. It insults
the very foundation of free society, free movement and free
speech.
Emergence of victim journalists is not a new
phenomenon in Nepal. It could be traced to various periods of
recent history in one form or another. The latest one refers
to news -persons who have suffered because of their reporting
on the on- going violent conflict. Their displacement has created
a wave of chain reaction in the society.
Over the decade the conflict has seen media
in three phases: first confused about what to cover and how
to cover, second conditioned in a pattern of coverage of events
and issues and third covering conflict with a sense of fear.
In all phases journalists appear to have shown a high sense
of information flow and responsibility. However, some people
strongly feel the conflict got intensified because of the highlight
it got in media while others think media tried to play fair
in coverage. The conflict -actors have their own version of
media coverage. In the study of media of this period, the conflict
coverage occupies an important place and journalists engaged
in it find a notable niche.
The Issue
The issue of conflict victim journalists is
actually related to human right to pursue a profession. It is
basically associated with citizens' basic need for earning a
living through a profession in a place of choice. Conflict,
particularly the violent one, denies all these and produces
dependent orphans out of what could be termed an independent,
buoyant, intelligent work-force in a society. The impact is
not limited to the individual victim, it extends to family and
also the community. Ultimately it challenges the values to which
free press and free society are committed. As the question of
looking after them with a sense of responsibility remains unanswered,
the burden of the same gets heavier day by day. It could create
further social and economic problems in the long run in both
micro and macro level.
Journalistic linkages -forward and backward
- with society and information flow are highly sensitive. Any
disturbance in it rocks the whole structure, besides paralyzing
various processes inside it.
As journalists' job is closely linked with
the community and its members, their victimization results in
various types of social wounds and fractures. With no journalist
to report, the community sinks into dark pit unable to communicate
with neighbours and others about their aspirations, need, plan,
or problem, pain and difficulties. Only a few could benefit
from what is known as "information vacuum." Those
who are opposed to values of pluralism and democracy could cherish
this scenario marked by complete incommunicado. Others simply
suffer in frustration.
The journalists who are victims today may
have erred in the past and some of them could have committed
blunder in reporting. They should have been given opportunity
to correct mistakes and a sense of tolerance should have been
displayed because after all they belong to the media-frontier,
where neutrality is championed and no personal agenda are advocated.
Messengers, they say, enjoy special protocal for protection
in all cultures and societies. The dictum of free press presupposes
not anarchy but rule of law, not functioning in isolation but
working in and with the society and its norms, not prejudice
but the reality obtaining in a given context and background.
Peace approach
Although peace - approach is as old as human
civilization, the hide and seek between it and violence turns
out to be the continuing reality that mankind has seen always
in various parts of the world. "Peace has lower priority,
as seen clearly when we compare the size of the professional
war and peace establishments of states, " some say. Others
refer to the connotation of peace: ability to handle conflict,
with empathy, nonviolence and creativity. TRANSCEND literature
indicates the ABC - triangle meaning "Conflict =Attitudes
+ Behaviour + Contradiction." At the root of the conflict
is a contradiction, the incompatible goals. The conflicts that
emerged after the Cold War in various parts of Europe, Latin
America, Asia and Africa are not exceptions. The conflict Nepal
has been witnessing at present also follows more or less the
same track and creates series of problems including displaced
journalists. The approach advocated by Peace Journalism could
be the best way to handle victim journalists.
The term Peace Journalism, it might be recalled,
began to be used in 1970s. Galtung found War Journalism as pursuing
the style of Sports Journalism with more "focus on winning
as the only thing in a zero-sum game of two parties." He
preferred to compare Peace Journalism to Health Journalism.
"A good Health Correspondent would describe a patient's
battle against cancerous cells eating away at the body. But
he or she would also tell us about the causes of cancer -lifestyle,
environment, genetic make-up, etc. as well as the full range
of possible cures and preventative measures."
Solidarity Network
The Solidarity Network is a collective institutional
expression of sympathy and cooperation towards victim journalists
in one hand and determination to keep up the spirit of the torch
of free press in difficult circumstances. It should be allowed
to evolve with the dynamics of media - situation and need of
the displaced media persons into a common platform, friendly
and accessible to all concerned. It acts like a referral centre
for those who have been victims.
Principles:
- The Network follows high principles of
human rights, democracy and free press. That is why it is
determined to help the victim journalists have an opportunity
to enjoy the high values. It makes efforts to create an atmosphere
in which victim journalists would not be produced.
- It is guided by the idea that conflict
victims should neither be ignored nor left helpless.
- The point that conflict actors should always
be approached positively for reconsidering their views on
conflict victims constitutes one of the directive principles
of the Network.
- Dialogue with positive attitude is the
tool it uses in approaching the issue of conflict victims
and attempting to open the required communication channel
all the time.
- Peace journalism is the "Style Book"
of the Network. The same guides it in handling conflict victims
and conflict issues.
- The three tier time bound process of providing
immediate first aid type help, followed up by income generating
cum confidence building scheme leading ultimately to full
fledged rehabilitation is to be pursued. Care should be taken
not to make the conflict victims become permanently dependent
on dole-out.
To begin with the Network should first study
the status of displaced media persons in the country and analyze
their need. The structure of the Network should be determined
by the analysis.
To man the Network:
Media houses, journalists in general, communication institutions
and members of civil society should be encouraged to join the
network as members, or observers or advisors. They should allocate
their representatives to man the Network through a committee.
To support
Civil society should be approached for supporting the Network.
Donors should be requested to finance time-bound three tier
support system - first aid type help, income generating and
confidence building scheme and rehabilitation. Details of the
same could be worked out after the status is analysed.
To administer
Journalists in general should be jointly encouraged to administer
the three- tier assistance programme.
Programme
The Network should, like TRANSCEND (founded in August 1993 by
Johan Galtung and Fumiko Nishimura, Otto Scharmer and Katrin
Kaufer as a conflict mediation organization) work out some base
for launching programmes. Activities such as action, education,
training, dissemination and research deserve special priority
consideration in addition to the relief and rehabilitation works.
To begin with it could design a programme and implement it in
an experimental manner. A broad outline of a draft programme
is suggested below:
Assistance programme for
victim journalists
|
Tier
|
Programme |
Objective |
Role of Victims |
Time |
Implementers |
Finance |
Remarks |
|
1
|
First aid type assistance,
immediate relief |
Survival |
Voluntary |
3 months |
Network and media bodies |
100% donation |
No individual will be retained
in this tier beyond time |
|
2
|
Income generating and confidence
building |
Empowerment |
Assignment |
9 months |
Media Houses/Civil society/other
businesses Government |
25% Nepali resources and
75% donation |
Three months could be considered
as concession period for retaining individuals in this tier |
|
3
|
Rehabilitation for being
self-reliant |
Independence |
Fixed job |
One year |
Media Industry/Business Government |
50% Nepali resources and
50 % donation |
No consideration for extending
time |
Not allowing newspersons to pursue their professions
freely would ultimately affect adversely the society and its
development. Efforts should, therefore, be made not to allow
displacement. The Solidarity Network, among other things, makes
people aware of this point and provides the remedial measure
for those already suffering from it.
|