|
Critical Impediments to Implementing
Media Code of Conduct
Organised by Department of Journalism and
Mass Communication (DJMC)
23-24 June 2004, Hetauda
The Central Department of Journalism and
Mass Communication, Tribhuvan University organised a two-day seminar
on "Critical Impediments to Implementing Media Code of Conduct,"
with support provided by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung at Hetauda from
June 23 to 24, 2004. The two-day programme attracted over 60 participants,
mostly journalists. Senior journalists and media academics were
the resources persons and key commentators who led lively discussions
on different aspects of the code of conduct, including its strengths
and weaknesses. The deliberations also included the issue of impediments
faced in its proper implementation so necessary for its credibility
and adherence by the news media in general.
Opening Session
Lecturer at the Department of Journalism and
Mass Communication (DJMC), Mr Chiranjibi Khanal spoke on the
importance of the seminar and its objectives. He noted that
the degree course on journalism and mass communication, introduced
by the Tribhuvan University, covered code of conduct for media
people.
President of Chitwan District unit of the
Federation of Nepalese Journalists, Mr. Bishnu Chhimeki stressed
that code of conduct enables journalists to follow a right track
when undertaking their professional assignments.
Mr Dhruba Prasad Chaulagain, President of
Makwanpur Bass Association, news does not seem to be important
when not published but once it is carried by the news media,
it has a lot of influence.
Mr Krishna Raj Tripathi, Local Administrator,
said that journalists should not be affiliated with any political
parties if they are to carry out their professional duties in
a free and independent manner.
Several other speakers reiterated the points
raised by the afore-mentioned speakers.
First Working Session
Associate Professor Lal Deusa Rai, who heads
the Central Department of Journalism and Mass Communication
presented a paper on the significance of media code of conduct
and some of the practices and difficulties faced by the world
of media in Nepal and abroad. Excerpts of his paper:
The question of what news to publish or broadcast
and what to drop is an important subject facing daily journalistic
exercise in the editorial room. The decision can be based on
the law provided that it is clear on the issue; if not, the
editor can and should take a decision based on ethics. The editor
may also be guided by the written code of conduct. In its absence,
s/he has to base the decision on the unwritten code of conduct
or his/her journalistic experience or individual intuitive process.
Sweden was the first country to introduce
code of conduct for mass media, whose history dates back to
more than a century ago. Nepal has a 24-point code of conduct
formulated in 2003 jointly by Press Council and Federation of
Nepalese Journalists.
Recently, the Centre for Investigative Journalism
in Nepal conducted a study on selection and presentation of
news by mainstream daily newspapers during the state of emergency
in a six-month period beginning November 26, 2000. The study
took into account the standards of Peace Journalism and Good
Journalism, the main components of which are considered to be
Accuracy, Fairness, Balance and Responsibility.
There is no clear mention of these criteria
either in Nepal's constitution or her press laws. Legal precedents
are inadequate in number. Studies in accordance with social
science investigation method can yield quantitative conclusions,
but in the absence of clear legal provisions it's not possible
to draw legal conclusions from such evaluation of Nepalese newspapers.
On the basis of the existing code of conduct,
only ethics-oriented evaluation is possible. Practices of Nepalese
journalism can also be analyzed on the basis of features of
Peace Journalism or Good Journalism once they are determined.
However, there is no provision for taking newspapers accused
of violating the code of conduct to court. Only the body responsible
for enforcing the code of conduct takes action.
A question arises: Does the joint code of
conduct announced by Press Council incorporate all the main
components of the concepts of Peace Journalism and Good Journalism?
If not, the criteria prevailing in which country or society
is the council trying to bring in? Are they universal values?
There are two bases for ethics. One is offered
by the official code of conduct while the other, in the absence
of the first, by values and norms evolved in the editor's social
and cultural environment together with his/her medium's policy
and regulation.
Code of conducts can be studied through their
classification into different categories. One means of classification
is the degree of emphasis on individual aspects- as dictated
by prevalent conditions- of the basic universal values on which
the code is based. Others are on the basis of country, organization,
medium, level of development of the country (developed and developing).
Yet another basis of classification is the content of code of
conduct-news, advertisement, public relations et al.
Nepal's latest code of conduct spells out
a journalist's duties in 11 points and prohibitions in 13 others,
an improvement over its predecessor which featured only the
"don'ts" in seven points. The definition of 'journalist'
has been widened taking into account all media. Prior to the
new code of conduct, FNJ and Press Council had separate code
of conduct. The country's first code of conduct for journalists
came out in Press Commission Report 2015 B.S.
By contrast, the Indian Press Council, the
oldest in South Asia, has instead of making a full-fledged code
of conduct prepared a list of principles to be kept in mind
while making one. For journalists in print media, the Editor's
Society has made a code of conduct while each radio and television
organization has its own advertisement-centered code of conduct.
The code of conduct prepared by Sri Lankan
Press Council received parliamentary endorsement before its
enforcement. The underlying principle of code of conduct in
South Asian countries is basically the same.
Comments
In his comments on the paper, Mr Keshab Prasad
Kafle described Associate Prof. Rai's paper as perceptive but
suggested that it would have been better if he had discussed
more on the Nepalese context and included the effects of other
countries' code of conduct. Comparative study of different codes
of conduct would go a long way in having a better understanding
of worldwide trend and practices. There are many issues that
the existing code of conduct in Nepal has not been able to encompass
and hence there is a need to make it more comprehensive.
Second Working Session
Mr Kaushal Pandey, President, FNJ, Makwanpur
presented a paper on "Code of Conduct: State of Local Journalism."
Excerpts of the paper:
According to a survey, titled "Journalists
outside the valley", done by Bachelor level students of
journalism at Ratna Rajya Campus in Kathmandu, 5.08 per cent
of journalists are ignorant about code of conduct while 8.47
per cent are partially aware of it, even as 86.44 per cent are
in the know. Similarly, 8.47 per cent said they hadn't implemented
code of conduct while 1.69 per cent opined that it was not necessary
to enforce the same.
This apathy to code of conduct among journalists
can be explained from three aspects. First, lack of professionalism,
and job and economic security in journalism in parts outside
the capital ward off people with formal education, with the
result that the profession rests basically on the shoulders
of those who have entered it out of compulsion or interest without
seriousness. This obviously leads to violation of code of conduct.
Second, though those practicing "mission
journalism" are found to have more integrity and stronger
ethical fiber than members of the other two afore-mentioned
groups, the practice in society of respecting people for their
wealth regardless of the means by which they earn it is also
responsible for decaying morality in journalism.
Third, level of education and enlightenment
of journalists and of others in their society also affect the
state of code of conduct.
Comment
Commenting on the paper, Mr D.R. Ghimire,
editor of Mechi-Kali daily paper, said the content of the paper
would have been richer and would have done better justice to
its title, if the conclusions drawn up were clear and precise
regarding the local context. Putting into practice the code
of conduct is more important than mere confining it to acdemic
study. The condition of local journalists is not satisfactory
and this can affect the actual implementation of a code of conduct.
Mr Chiranjibi Khanal, Lecturer at Central
Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, TU, made a
presentation on Code of Conduct for Radio and Television. Highlights
of the presentation:
It is only in the recent years that media
code of conduct and its need have come into public and press
debate at greater length. In the past, these were subjects hardly
discussed at such length. The existing code drawn up Press Council
Nepal in close consultation with the Federation of Nepalese
Journalists is not adequate to address the broadcasting sector,
including radio and television.
There is a debate as to whether a single media
council should formulate a code for all news media or whether
a separate body for the print and another body for radio and
television should be provided for. That there should not be
any comprehensive code for radio and television at a time when
such a news service accounts for a powerful and highly influential
sector of any society is unfortunate.
Given the reach and clout of the news media-both
print and audio-visual-efforts should be made to constantly
refine the existing code of conduct. Steps should also be taken
without any more delay in having a code that enables the audio-visual
media to be also monitored in keeping with a comprehensive code
that encompasses universally accepted practices in democratic
societies.
Discussions
There were extensive deliberations on all
the presentations. Concerns were expressed on the lack of proper
media monitoring system in the country. Issues of press freedom
and their responsibilities also came up. The participants agreed
that freedom was not unlimited. Privacy of individuals should
be respected.
The participants were divided into four groups,
each of which produced a brief report. The reports were the
basis for drawing up the following conclusions by the seminar
participants:
Recommendations
At the end of the seminar, the participants
and resource persons came up with a number of recommendations,
some of the major ones being the following:
- If journalism is indeed the fourth estate,
government should make adequate arrangements for it as have
been made for the other three estates.
- Journalists are not the only ones required
to abide by code of conduct, it is incumbent on those in other
fields as well to do so.
- Through education and training, professionalism
and responsibility should be inculcated in journalists.
- Existing code of conduct does not cover
adequately radio and television.
- Journalism and journalists must have a
mission, in the absence of which there will be no basis for
issuing directives.
- Call for journalists to vow to put code
of conduct to practice.
- Criminals should be targeted.
- Should be mindful of law in the country
and other countries
|